
Agriculture has increased the intensity of malaria around the world, because it can support the breeding of mosquitoes that carry the malaria parasite. Urbanization is increasing in most developing countries as a result of population growth. To feed the increasing population, farmers are cultivating undeveloped land around cities to produce and supply vegetables to the city dwellers. Water is vital for the success of the venture as cultivation is done year round. However, water is scarce in most of the cities and so it becomes a constraining factor. Farmers have learned to adapt to the constraints by storing water in dugouts and bunds. These water storage receptacles provide favorable aquatic habitats for mosquitoes. Additionally, farmers are implementing irrigation methods, such as furrow irrigation, that increase the potential for mosquito breeding. People who live around these urban agricultural field gardens easily contract malaria throughout the year if they are not properly protected by bed nets or pesticides or other control measures. It is important for policy makers to be cognizant of the relationship between agriculture and health when devising agricultural development and disease control policies and strategies.
For more information see The Linkages Between Agriculture and Malaria: Issues for Policy, Research, and Capacity Strengthening
One of the lingering effects of the food price crisis of 2007–08 on the world food system is the proliferating acquisition of farmland in developing countries by other countries seeking to ensure their food supplies. Increased pressures on natural resources, water scarcity, export restrictions imposed by major producers when food prices were high, and growing distrust in the functioning of regional and global markets have pushed countries short in land and water to find alternative means of producing food. These land acquisitions have the potential to inject much-needed investment into agriculture and rural areas in poor developing countries, but they also raise concerns about the impacts on poor local people, who risk losing access to and control over land on which they depend. It is crucial to ensure that these land deals, and the environment within which they take place, are designed in ways that will reduce the threats and facilitate the opportunities for all parties involved.
Read full brief
Around the world, women like Filomena Reyes Gomez, a Mexican mother of three, are on the frontlines in the fight against poverty, hunger, and malnutrition. But Filomena is starting to win that battle. She sends her 12-year-old daughter to school, takes her baby for regular medical check-ups, and attends health and nutrition education sessions. And gets paid for it.
Filomena participates in a government-run conditional cash transfer program that puts money directly into the hands of poor women and provides their children with basic healthcare.
"I spend the money on food and shoes," said Filomena. "It has helped us keep our children healthy and means they can go to school to have a better life."
Years of IFPRI research shows that empowering women is key to improving food and nutrition security. When resources, such as cash and food assistance, are targeted to women, their children are healthier and better educated.
While public school is free in Mexico, cash payments help families pay for basic supplies and provide a strong incentive to ensure their children attend consistently. To encourage female education, the program provides more money for girls than boys to support their schooling. Educating girls is critical. According to IFPRI research, female education is the single greatest way to reduce child malnutrition.
"The program helps us a lot and then we can help our kids," explained Filomena.
Improving a woman’s social and economic status not only improves the health, life, and longevity of her children, it benefits all of society.
To learn more about IFPRI’s research on Gender and Development, visit: http://www.ifpri.org/themes/gender/gender.htm
The 2007/08 international food price crisis caused hardship on a number of fronts. The steep rise in food prices led to economic difficulties for the poor and generated political turmoil in many countries. The crisis could also result in long-term, irreversible nutritional damage, especially among children. There is a global interest in preventing such events from recurring. This episode highlights the need to modify the architecture of international financial and agricultural markets to address the problem of price spikes, especially their effects on the livelihoods of the poor.
Although a set of guiding principles for regulating agricultural and commodity futures markets should be developed and recent inappropriate trade policy instruments such as export bans should be reviewed, these actions are not sufficient to avoid extreme price spikes and to ensure that the world can respond to emergency needs for food. We propose three global collective actions to meet these goals.
This note offers some specifics on implementing this proposal to stimulate further discussion.
Price instability is a general feature of agricultural markets. The proposals made here are designed not to stabilize prices generally, but to prevent damaging price spikes and the collapse of confidence in the international grain market. The proposed actions will entail costs, but the modest costs of the required organizational elements must be balanced against the benefits of more effective international financial architecture. These benefits will include prevention of economic hardship, improved market efficiency, stronger incentives for long-term investment in agriculture, and prevention of political instability.